Evil Democracy: 1932 Thumbnail

Evil Democracy: 1932 similar games & best alternatives

Evil Democracy: 1932

PC (Microsoft Windows) • 2020

Related articles

Quick resume

In the unique world of this political simulator, you travel to Europe, 1932-1935, to become the party leader in one of the following countries: Germany, France, or England. You have a real chance to become the winner of WWII even before it begins...

Global score

74/100

Genres

Indie, Simulator, Strategy

Similar games

    Pros

    • Unique political simulation
    • Historical setting and scenarios
    • Customizable parties and dogmas
    • Strategic and absorbing gameplay
    • Active developer updates

    Cons

    • Limited content and replayability
    • Simple and repetitive mechanics
    • Weak tutorial and guidance
    • Lack of multiplayer or social features
    • Modest graphics and audio

    Analysis

    Less representative of its motivational profile, with noticeable differences. Motivations that often define this kind of title include Competition, Fellowship, Domination, Status. It leans lower than usual among comparable games on Violence, Fellowship, Cooperation.

    How to use the graph
    Similar games map

    Each dot is a game. They are arranged from the same motivation profile as in the “Motivations” section below. Closer dots usually mean more similar reasons to play (exploration, competition, relaxation, etc.)—not that one game is “better” than another.

    • Larger dot with a light outline: the game you are viewing.
    • Colour: groups of games with comparable motivation patterns (statistical clusters).
    • Hover a dot to see the game name; click to open its page.
    • Scroll or double-click the chart to zoom out and see more games.

    Why don’t the axes read like a score? This view uses t-SNE: it only keeps who is close to whom. The scales are not “good to bad” or hours played—they separate groups on the map. Read distance between dots, not the axis numbers.

    Motivations

    • Autonomy
      4

      "Players have freedom to choose country, party, dogmas, and strategies to win elections, indicating high control over decisions."

    • Competence
      3

      "Game involves managing resources, balancing budgets, and strategic planning, providing moderate skill challenge and feedback."

    • Competition
      4

      "Focus on winning elections against other parties and outperforming opponents in political campaigns."

    • Continuation
      1

      "Some players report moderate replayability and engagement, but the game can be completed in a few hours and may become repetitive."

    • Cooperation
      -3

      "Gameplay centers on individual party management and competition; limited evidence of cooperative multiplayer or teamwork."

    • Creativity
      3

      "Players can create unique parties by selecting dogmas and ideologies, customizing strategies and party composition."

    • Domination
      3

      "Players exert control over political landscape and opponents through manipulation, propaganda, and election rigging."

    • Escapism
      3

      "Players use the game as a distraction and to explore alternative historical scenarios, providing a form of escapism."

    • Expectation
      -4

      "Players engage voluntarily out of personal interest in politics and strategy without external pressure."

    • Experimenting
      3

      "Players try different parties, dogmas, and strategies to explore various election outcomes and game mechanics."

    • Exploration
      1

      "Some exploration of different scenarios and political parties, but limited discovery of new areas or secrets."

    • Expression
      2

      "Customization of party dogmas and ideologies allows some self-expression within the political simulation."

    • Fantasy
      -3

      "Game is grounded in historical realism and plausible political scenarios of 1930s Europe."

    • Fellowship
      -4

      "Primarily a single-player experience with minimal social or community interaction reported."

    • Growth
      2

      "Players learn political mechanics and improve strategies over time, though complexity is moderate."

    • Health
      -5

      "Typical sedentary gameplay without physical activity or health-related features."

    • Idle
      -2

      "Requires focused attention on resource management and strategic decisions rather than passive or idle play."

    • Intimacy
      -5

      "No evidence of close social relationships or emotional sharing in gameplay."

    • Leadership
      3

      "Players lead political parties, manage leaders, and make authoritative decisions to guide their party to victory."

    • Progression
      3

      "Players accumulate resources, influence, and voter support to progress through elections."

    • Relaxation
      1

      "Some players find the game meditative and absorbing, though others note it can be repetitive."

    • Sensation
      1

      "Visuals and music are modest; some players appreciate atmosphere but sensory stimulation is moderate."

    • Status
      -3

      "Focus is on internal game success rather than social recognition or popularity."

    • Story
      2

      "Game includes historical context and scenarios with narrative elements related to 1930s politics."

    • Strategy
      4

      "Strong emphasis on strategic planning, resource allocation, and tactical decision-making."

    • Thrill
      1

      "Some tension from election competition, but overall gameplay is controlled and predictable."

    • Value
      2

      "Players find value in unique political simulation and historical setting, especially at discounted prices."

    • Violence
      -4

      "Gameplay focuses on political maneuvering and campaigning rather than physical violence or destruction."

    • Survival
      2

      "Players must manage threats to party success and avoid failure in elections, involving risk management."

    Where to buy

    Come talk about it on Discord!

    Last update: 29/04/2026