There Are No Orcs Thumbnail

There Are No Orcs similar games & best alternatives

There Are No Orcs

PC (Microsoft Windows) • 2025

Related articles

Quick resume

An RTS-Roguelike hybrid with auto-battling troops. Master building placement, swarm your enemies, and smash their defenses with unit-commander combos!

Global score

94/100

Genres

Indie, Strategy

Similar games

    Pros

    • Engaging strategic gameplay with deep commander variety
    • Good progression and replayability
    • Charming pixel art and sound design
    • Accessible yet challenging difficulty scaling
    • Affordable price with strong value

    Cons

    • Limited map variety and repetitive objectives
    • Some balance issues with overpowered strategies
    • No multiplayer or cooperative modes
    • Minimal narrative or story elements
    • Lack of physical activity or health-related features

    Analysis

    Broadly representative of its motivational profile, with a few distinct shifts. Motivations that often define this kind of title include Fellowship, Cooperation, Leadership, Violence. Here, the score leans higher than usual among comparable games on Strategy, Leadership. It leans lower than usual among comparable games on Story.

    How to use the graph
    Similar games map

    Each dot is a game. They are arranged from the same motivation profile as in the “Motivations” section below. Closer dots usually mean more similar reasons to play (exploration, competition, relaxation, etc.)—not that one game is “better” than another.

    • Larger dot with a light outline: the game you are viewing.
    • Colour: groups of games with comparable motivation patterns (statistical clusters).
    • Hover a dot to see the game name; click to open its page.
    • Scroll or double-click the chart to zoom out and see more games.

    Why don’t the axes read like a score? This view uses t-SNE: it only keeps who is close to whom. The scales are not “good to bad” or hours played—they separate groups on the map. Read distance between dots, not the axis numbers.

    Motivations

    • Autonomy
      3

      "Players have control over building placement, commander selection, relic choices, and strategic decisions, but combat is automated."

    • Competence
      4

      "Game offers strategic depth, skillful building placement, and commander mastery with feedback through progression and difficulty scaling."

    • Competition
      -3

      "Focus is primarily on single-player progression and personal challenge; multiplayer is absent or minimal."

    • Continuation
      4

      "Players report long play sessions, replayability through commanders, and a strong "one more run" motivation."

    • Cooperation
      -5

      "Game is single-player focused with no cooperative multiplayer elements."

    • Creativity
      4

      "High creativity in building layouts, commander strategies, relic combinations, and adapting to modifiers."

    • Domination
      -4

      "Interactions are primarily against AI with no evidence of social dominance or trash talk."

    • Escapism
      4

      "Players use the game as a relaxing, engaging distraction with charming art and satisfying gameplay."

    • Expectation
      -4

      "Players engage voluntarily for fun and personal interest without obligation or external pressure."

    • Experimenting
      5

      "Strong emphasis on trying different commanders, builds, relics, and strategies to find optimal synergies."

    • Exploration
      2

      "Some exploration of different commanders, races, and synergies, but limited map variety."

    • Expression
      2

      "Customization mainly through commander choice and gear; no avatar personalization."

    • Fantasy
      4

      "Fantasy setting with imaginative races, commanders, and units, though no orcs present."

    • Fellowship
      -4

      "Minimal social or community interaction; primarily solo play."

    • Growth
      4

      "Progression through unlocking commanders, gear, and difficulty levels supports learning and mastery."

    • Health
      -5

      "Sedentary gameplay with no physical activity components."

    • Idle
      -3

      "Requires active attention for building placement and strategy; not a passive idle game."

    • Intimacy
      -5

      "No evidence of close social relationships or emotional sharing in gameplay."

    • Leadership
      -3

      "No multiplayer leadership roles; player leads own strategy but no group management."

    • Progression
      4

      "Strong progression via unlocking commanders, gear, relics, and increasing difficulty tiers."

    • Relaxation
      3

      "Game is described as relaxing and satisfying, balancing challenge with flow."

    • Sensation
      2

      "Enjoyable pixel art and sound design provide moderate sensory stimulation."

    • Status
      -4

      "No social status or recognition systems; achievements are personal."

    • Story
      -3

      "Minimal narrative focus; gameplay centers on mechanics and strategy rather than story."

    • Strategy
      5

      "Core gameplay revolves around strategic building placement, resource management, and adapting to modifiers."

    • Thrill
      1

      "Some tension from managing resources and timing, but overall controlled and predictable gameplay."

    • Value
      4

      "Players report high value for price with many hours of engaging content."

    • Violence
      2

      "Combat is present but automated and stylized; focus is on building and strategy rather than violent action."

    • Survival
      3

      "Players must defend their base and manage resources to avoid defeat, with escalating difficulty."

    Where to buy

    Come talk about it on Discord!

    Last update: 29/04/2026